
Andrew Samtoy
The 1st song by the notorious B.I.G. that I ever heard and liked was “The Ten Crack Commandments.” Rule Nombre Uno, he opines, is to “never let no one know how much dough you hold.” This fit in with a personal philosophy of mine: that one that should endeavor not to disclose how much one has to others. In fact, within reason, the more disadvantaged you seem to others, the better off you are. If you don’t appear wealthy, they won’t be jealous of you and try to tear you down. It is always better to over-estimate and be under-estimated.
This has application in the present personal challenge. For the balance of this post and this challenge, I will no longer be talking about my meals in as much detail as I have previously. I will not tell you, or the others attempting to win this personal challenge, about the meal I made last night– of the caramelized onions, the minced mushrooms browned over medium-sized flames, the way that the egg rose and flattened, as if breathing, before I folded it over the filling and then put it between two slices of bread to make a wondrous sandwich, overstuffed to the point that the filling fell out and I had to eat it with a fork from the plate. I’ll also not discuss the bowl of diced, microwaved potatoes, with resistant outer layers and tender, steaming insides. I won’t go into the tofu and vegetables waiting for me at home, or the seven eggs I anticipate having left over, as well as the chicken, rice, potatoes and onions I won’t be able to eat. What’s the point? I have enough food to last me far past the end of this week for the challenge, but talking about it to excess will give away my position.
In terms of the challenge, then, there is no debate left. I won, and I thank God, my family, my friends and all of the people who believed in me, in that order. Now, it’s time to start talking about what winning means.
First, it should be clear that most of our writing has been somewhat in jest. We recognize that there is no way to replicate the experience of living on food checks and welfare other than to actually do it. “Doing it” includes the conditions of living in poverty not just those limitations on budget. None of us had these limitations; with only financial constraints, this was really “Welfare-lite.”
I can also see where surviving for months, or years, on food stamps would be difficult (and, as my girlfriend pointed out, mentally and emotionally challenging as well). While it’s entirely conceivable for people to survive on this allocation, the advantages my fellow participants have in terms of mobility, access and time – especially the advantages Mitch has taken advantage of over and over again in each of these areas – have made this a sort of mockery of a week on welfare and food stamps. We’ve not lived like we were on Welfare; we adapted Welfare budgets to our own conditions and goals. I believe that my food eventually came from four different stores, at least; it is not reasonable to expect that others would enjoy the same mobility and access. To accurately live as if we were on Welfare, each individual should have been given a typical set of goods to purchase from a single store within a certain distance from their abode.
Nothing in life is ever perfect; there are always limited resources. For people in a position where they have limited resources, sometimes one must give up other things in order to make intelligent decisions. Indeed, since we have always had limited resources, we’ve always made decisions on how to best allocate these resources – even Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have to decide how they want to spend their money, since they can’t buy everything. In this case, I believe I’ve made the most intelligent decisions possible given my resources.
I also recognize that my own success in eating a healthy, well-balanced diet over the course of the week by no means is what most people on welfare can actually accomplish, just as many people on welfare will not be able to smoke or drink as much as the other participants did this week. I think that my situation does show it’s possible, but I’m in no position to say that my consumption levels are available for anyone on Welfare.
I still believe that it is possible to eat healthy food on this limited budget. Except for Tom, everyone seems to have had relatively healthy meals; however, I think I may be the only person in the group to have had healthy meals in both wide variety and abundance. This came down to choices: what to consume and where to buy it. I made the choices to forgo other options on which to spend my money. I’ve never done any illegal drugs, even pot; thus, I was not tempted to reserve part of my budget for these. I rarely drink alcohol, so I was not tempted to put money aside for that – it wasn’t an option. I don’t smoke cigarettes, so I haven’t been shopping around for rolling papers. I drink a cup of coffee a day; that was relatively easy and inexpensive to secure.
What I will take away from this is that I can live healthily on a lot less than I used to use for food. From now on I am going to endeavor to eat on about the equivalent of $25 a week, saving more money for long-term financial stability. Instead of budgeting for weeks, though, I’ll be purchasing for longer terms – i.e., using a bulk bag of onions over weeks, and buying them when I run out, rather than aiming to just purchase for the upcoming week. I’ll also be donating more money to help feed those who don’t have the advantages that I have.
I had a dollar and change left after this challenge. At lunch, I went to the Mexican grocery store near my work and purchased 20 five-cent candies. I left them at the counter with one of the managers and asked him to give them to the next 20 children that walked in for free. After all, many of them are poor and their parents might be on welfare; they would enjoy the candy more than I would.
And with that, I won. Now for a celebratory meal.






